This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While data scientists were no longer handling Hadoop-sized workloads, they were trying to build predictivemodels on a different kind of “large” dataset: so-called “unstructured data.” ” There’s as much Keras, TensorFlow, and Torch today as there was Hadoop back in 2010-2012. And it was good.
MANOVA, for example, can test if the heights and weights in boys and girls is different. This statistical test is correct because the data are (presumably) bivariate normal. In high dimensions the data assumptions needed for statistical testing are not met. The accuracy of any predictivemodel approaches 100%.
This is to prevent any information leakage into our test set. 2f%% of the test set." 2f%% of the test set." Fraudulent transactions are 0.17% of the test set. 2f%% of the test set." Fraudulent transactions are 50.00% of the test set. Model training. Feature Engineering. References. [1]
We compared the output of a random effects model to a penalized GLM solver with "Elastic Net" regularization (i.e. both L1 and L2 penalties; see [8]) which were tuned for test set accuracy (log likelihood). These large timing tests had roughly 500 million and 800 million training examples respectively. ICML, (2005). [3]
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 42,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content