This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There are three elements to our "big data" efforts, or unhyped normal data efforts: Data Collection, Data Reporting, and Data Analysis. After all you spent so much time on collection, reporting and analysis. Finally, this is picky, but why is most of the x-axis yearly and then suddenly just until Q2, 2013?
One that reflects the customer expectations of 2013. Or Ford (it is amazing that in 2013, for such an expensive product, it looks so… 2005). If you open your copy of Google/Adobe Analytics or CoreMetrics or Webtrekk you'll notice that every single report has a gigantic number of metrics in it. Look at the colors.
The difference between a Reporting Squirrel and Analysis Ninja? As in, the former is in the business of providing data, the latter in the business of understanding the performance implied by the data. That understanding leads to insights about why the performance occurred, which leads to so what we should do. Rest is irrelevant.
In this type of an environment, I've frequently stressed the value of identifying targets for your keyperformanceindicators. should be 1,356,000), you've set a clear line in the sand as to what performance will be declared a success or a failure at the end of the measurement time period.
That's the difference between someone who reports data to someone who drives change in behavior. Great question… This last piece of data, how much video advertising's influence has changed between 2013 and 2015 in the individual making their final choice, is killer. We have it handy, we'll use it.
A benchmark for you: In 2013 if 30% of your time, Ms./Mr. It is expensive from a systems/platforms/data processing/data reporting perspective. But it is not a keyperformanceindicator. Just look at your own reports. In the latter group I discovered that there were two common themes. " Right-time.
But many companies fail to achieve this goal because they struggle to provide the reporting and analytics users have come to expect. These tools prep that data for analysis and then provide reporting on it from a central viewpoint. These reports are critical to making decisions. that gathers data from many sources.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 42,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content