This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In the previous post, we talked about data virtualization and how Ontotext’s RDF database for knowledge graphsGraphDB provides the tools for the full journey from graphs to relational tables and back. This post continues our series in which we want to provide an overview of what we do and how our webinars fit into it.
Graph Databases vs Relational Databases. Ironically, relational databases only imply relationships between data points by whatever row or column they exist in. However, when it comes to queries that involve large and highly interconnected master data, the performance is solidly in favour of graph databases like GraphDB.
An ontology or a knowledge graph of any appreciable size requires some effort on the part of the consumer before it becomes a useful tool. Knowledge of the subject domain is always helpful, but rarely sufficient as there are many choices to be made in representing domain knowledge as data in a graph. FIBO Overview.
Enterprise knowledge graphs (EKG) require graph databases, which serve multiple purposes. The engines must facilitate the advanced data integration and metadata data management scenarios where an EKG is used for data fabrics or otherwise serves as a data hub between diverse data and content management systems. This era is over!
In our previous post, we covered the basics of how the Ontotext and metaphacts joint solution based on GraphDB and metaphactory helps customers accelerate their knowledge graph journey and generate value from it in a matter of days. LinkedLifeData Inventory Pre-loaded In GraphDB. The Background Story.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 42,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content