This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
AI coding agents are poised to take over a large chunk of software development in coming years, but the change will come with intellectual property legal risk, some lawyers say. The legal issues aren’t likely to go away anytime soon, adds Michael Word, an IP and IT-focused lawyer at the Dykema Gossett law firm.
In a shocking turn of events, a New York lawyer finds himself entangled in a courtroom drama after relying on the AI tool, ChatGPT for legal research. ” This was because when it was discovered that the lawyer’s filing referenced fake legal cases.
ChatGPT Breaks New Ground in Indian Court Proceedings AI is revolutionizing the legal sector! The court clarified that […] The post AI Revolution in Legal Sector: Chatbots Take Center Stage in Courtrooms appeared first on Analytics Vidhya.
Media mogul Barry Diller and a group of prominent publishers are gearing up for a legal battle against the use of published works in training artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In […] The post Barry Diller Vs. Generative AI: Copyright Legal Battle appeared first on Analytics Vidhya.
Join Onna and experts from Quip, Airbnb, and Oracle for this live webinar as they dive into proactive data deletion policies, retention strategies, and legal hold practices that are essential to a modern enterprise information governance strategy.
We explore why understanding how models make predictions is crucial, especially as these technologies are used in critical fields like healthcare, finance, and legal systems. In this article, we dive into the concepts of machine learning and artificial intelligence model explainability and interpretability.
From groundbreaking product launches to leadership shake-ups and even legal disputes, OpenAI navigated a whirlwind of events. The year 2024 was nothing short of a rollercoaster for OpenAI, a company that has become synonymous with the cutting edge of artificial intelligence.
In a new twist of events, Zoom, the popular videoconferencing platform, is entangled in a legal predicament regarding using customer data for training artificial intelligence (AI) models. Join us as we dissect the unfolding […] The post Zoom Uses Customer Data for AI Training; Faces Legal Quandary appeared first on Analytics Vidhya.
Imagine an AI that can write poetry, draft legal documents, or summarize complex research papersbut how do we truly measure its effectiveness? As Large Language Models (LLMs) blur the lines between human and machine-generated content, the quest for reliable evaluation metrics has become more critical than ever.
From a legal and regulatory perspective, Erika R. Without simplified fundamentals, security and compliance programs may allow too much interpretation or variance that could result in vulnerabilities – ranging from annoying to catastrophic. Bales, Esq.
From GenAI-driven logistics to AI-powered finance and legal tech, companies across India are offering exciting ML roles that go far beyond textbook theory. If youre a student or early professional eager to apply your Machine Learning skills in the real world, an internship is your best starting point.
Are we prepared to handle the ethical, legal, and compliance implications of AI deployment? Sack says companies need to consider what ethical, legal, and compliance implications could arise from their AI strategies and use cases and address those earlier rather than later. Manry says such questions are top of mind at her company.
Meta Platforms, formerly Facebook, finds itself entangled in legal turbulence as renowned figures like comedian Sarah Silverman and Pulitzer Prize winner Michael Chabon, among others, unite against the tech giant.
This move comes amidst a legal feud between Musk and OpenAI, the organization he co-founded but later departed from. Elon Musk, the brain behind ventures like Tesla and SpaceX, made waves in the tech world again this week with his announcement of open-sourcing xAI’s AI chatbot, Grok.
With these regulatory and legal requirements, policymakers want to protect society and thus create trust in new technologies. This is the only way for companies offering digital products, services and functions to be legally compliant in the long term at an early stage. How should these be marketed?
From filling forms at hospitals and checking legal documents to analyzing video footage and handling customer support – we have AI agents for all kinds of tasks. AI agents are now a part of enterprises big and small.
In a significant legal development, The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against technology giants Microsoft and OpenAI for alleged copyright infringement. The lawsuit, filed in New York, claims that both companies used copyrighted articles from The Times to train AI models.
In a stunning legal development, renowned comedian Sarah Silverman and acclaimed authors Christopher Golden and Richard Kadrey have filed lawsuits against OpenAI and Meta. These lawsuits, alleging copyright infringement, have thrust the use of AI models into the spotlight.
In a legal battle that could reshape the landscape of AI-related processors, computer scientist Joseph Bates has filed a $1.67 billion lawsuit against Alphabet’s Google. The founder of Singular Computer alleges that Google utilized his innovations without proper credit or compensation to develop processors integral to various AI applications.
In a legal matter that grabbed the attention of the tech and journalism communities, OpenAI, the force behind ChatGPT, has responded assertively to a copyright lawsuit from the New York Times. The lawsuit, filed late last year against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleges copyright infringement.
Data use is no longer a “wild west” in which anything goes; there are legal and reputational consequences for using data improperly. In the next year, increased regulation (such as GDPR, CCPA), antitrust, and other legal forces will force companies to adopt responsible ML practices.
Introduction Smart contracts are a type of digital agreement based on blockchain technology and are executed to form a legal contract between two parties involved. Smart contracts have been in the market even before the advent of blockchain technology.
erroneous results), and an equal amount (32%) mentioned legal risk. In our recent ISG Market Lens study on generative AI, 39% of participants cited data privacy and security among the biggest inhibitors to adopting AI. Nearly a third (32%) identified performance and quality (e.g.,
Costa Rica has taken an interesting step in regulating artificial intelligence (AI) by turning to an unlikely source for legal expertise – ChatGPT. In a move that caught the attention of policymakers worldwide, Costa Rican politicians sought the assistance of the AI-powered chatbot to draft a new law governing AI.
It’s not about staying within legal boundaries; ethics is a discussion about what’s right, not a set of rules. Compliance functions are powerful because legal violations result in clear financial costs. Legal compliance is increasingly inadequate for this powerful stakeholder. Ethics is much more slippery.
We have many current and future copyright challenges: training may not infringe copyright, but legal doesn’t mean legitimate—we consider the analogy of MegaFace where surveillance models have been trained on photos of minors, for example, without informed consent. Specific prompts seem to “unlock” training data.
The courts will have to decide whether inadvertent, inconsequential, or unpredictable reproduction meets the legal definition of copyright infringement. OpenAI keeps its hands clean, and its legal budget unspent. That’s what the endgame to the legal battle between OpenAI and the Times is all about.
The three requirements for entering the AI Pact-covering technical, ethical, and legal aspects-are, in themselves, already the basis of AI Act compliance for all companies. The CIO needs to understand where the post-market scrutiny lies. I think this is also an essential task for all companies.
Many legal departments can benefit from intelligent document management where the time to review contracts impacts operations. With traditional OCR and AI models, you might get 60% straight-through processing, 70% if youre lucky, but now generative AI solves all of the edge cases, and your processing rates go up to 99%, Beckley says.
In recent years, there’ve been a number of smaller AI products geared toward the legal profession, but it wasn’t until gen AI caught on that Swedish law firm Setterwalls really saw the benefit. “We We saw that there was potential to benefit on a broad front,” says CIO Daniel Sandberg.
“One of the things about disruption is that the legal sector is always so far behind. Jacknis agrees, noting that “It will be one of the great legal debates of this century” but reassures CIOs that this is a well-traveled path for technology adoption. The reality is that enforcing laws such as copyright is going to be very difficult.
Microsoft, which offers Whisper as part of its cloud computing services, advises companies incorporating it in the solutions they offer to “obtain appropriate legal advice to review your solution, particularly if you will use it in sensitive or high-risk applications.”
Then theres the operational complexity of running open source models, and the potential legal liabilities. Legal indemnification is a common feature of gen AI contracts from OpenAI, Microsoft, Adobe, and other major vendors. Model creators dont often take on legal liability, says Chandrasekaran.
Plus, forming close partnerships with legal teams is essential to understand the new levels of risk and compliance issues that gen AI brings. IT leaders must provide wise counsel on strategic deployment, ensuring that these technologies are integrated thoughtfully and effectively.
As an e-discovery company that helps law firms, corporations, and government agencies mine digital data for legal cases, Relativity knows the value of guaranteeing that people have the appropriate level of access to do their jobs.
According to the study, key areas where banks are currently focusing on gen AI include: Transactional use cases: Three out of five (61%) banks use the technology for transactional use cases such as credit analysis, portfolio management, risk assessment, legal contracts, offers, tenders, and pitch documents.
To build a robust cybersecurity business case and prepare for Q-Day, enterprise leaders should prioritize the following steps: Establish Cross-Functional Teams: Create collaboration among IT, compliance, legal and operational departments to collectively address the impending quantum threats.
As part of a collaborative team that spans Mary Free Bed’s departments and functions, IT listens to and works with clinicians, the legal team, the compliance team, and others to provide exceptional patient care. Peoples views IT as an equal team member in providing critical healthcare services, on par with all others in reaching those goals.
The second most common reason was concern about legal issues, risk, and compliance (18% for nonusers, 20% for users). The legal consequences of using generative AI are still unknown. Such policies would be designed to mitigate legal problems and require regulatory compliance. They’d also prefer to avoid legal liability.
Legal documents, HR data, source code, and other sensitive corporate information is being fed into unlicensed, publicly available AIs at a swift rate, leaving IT leaders with a mounting shadow AI mess.
What AI means for Rutkowski’s business model is an interesting legal question, but Van Gogh certainly isn’t feeling any pressure.) It’s not the ability to create new art works—we always need new art, but don’t need more Van Goghs, Mondrians, or even computer-generated Rutkowskis.
It’s worth noting that model durability and retraining can raise legal and policy issues. As such, an AI Product Manager’s responsibility here extends to releasing not only a usable product, but one that can be ethically and legally consumed. objective functions, major changes to hyperparameters, etc.)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 42,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content